Wisconsin Supreme Court puts on hold lower court ruling that voided GOP redistricting contracts | Local Government

Bizar Male

Wisconsin Supreme Court entrance in Capitol Building

The entrance to the Wisconsin Supreme Court chambers in the state Capitol. 

In a 4-3 split, the Wisconsin Supreme Court on Thursday put on hold a ruling from a Dane County judge that voided legal contracts Republican legislative leaders had signed with private taxpayer-funded attorneys to represent them in the anticipation of litigation over the state’s redistricting process.

In a further order, the state’s highest court, in a unanimous ruling, opted to grant a request to take over the case, bypassing the state Court of Appeals. 

After getting the final out on a tapper back to pitcher Josh Caron, the Sun Prairie baseball team celebrates the school’s ninth WIAA Division 1 state baseball championship. The Cardinals beat Bay Port, 11-2, at Fox Cities Stadium in Grand Chute.

Art Kabelowsky | Wisconsin State Journal

The ruling is the first indication the court’s conservative majority will side with Republicans on redistricting issues, which could determine control of the Legislature for the next 10 years.

Dane County Circuit Court Judge Stephen Ehlke in April granted the request filed by a taxpayer group that includes the head of the Madison teachers union, Andrew Waity. He also turned down a motion by the Legislature to put his ruling on hold, which is what the Supreme Court overturned Thursday.

Assembly appeals ruling that Assembly violated open records laws

The lawsuit alleged Assembly Speaker Robin Vos, R-Rochester, and Senate Majority Leader Devin LeMahieu, R-Oostburg, illegally signed contracts with two law firms. The lawsuit charged that because no redistricting litigation exists yet in the state, state law doesn’t allow for the Legislature to hire outside counsel at taxpayer expense.

Democrat announces bid to represent Wisconsin's 1st Congressional District

Vos and LeMahieu entered into a contract in December with the law firm Consovoy McCarthy for possible redistricting litigation and in January with Bell Giftos St. John for advice on legal requirements for redistricting as well as potential litigation. The Republican leaders argued they were justified in hiring the law firms, despite there being no current redistricting litigation, based on the Legislature’s core power under the Wisconsin Constitution.

Next Post

Ohio’s NIL law and what it means for your campus | Bricker & Eckler LLP

The summer slowdown has proven particularly elusive for campus athletics and compliance departments, not to mention general counsel. In a last minute move to salvage what started as a bipartisan legislative effort, Ohio Governor Mike DeWine signed Executive Order 2021-10D, which allows Ohio’s college athletes to monetize their name, image, […]