Union’s Contract Arbitration Provision Not Valid, Judge Says

Bizar Male
Law360 (May 27, 2021, 7:38 PM EDT) — An arbitrator can’t impose a collective bargaining agreement on four contractors because the arbitration provision their union counterpart invoked to break their impasse was similarly forced on them in the last round of contract talks, an Arkansas federal judge has said.

U.S. District Judge Kristine Baker of the Eastern District of Arkansas granted the contractors summary judgment Wednesday in their bid for declaratory judgment that Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers Local 36-L couldn’t force a contract on them again in 2020 after doing so in 2017. The judge cited precedent holding that so-called interest arbitration provisions are unenforceable if…

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Next Post

San Jose Shooter Was Previously Questioned by Law Enforcement Over Hatred of Workplace

U.S. Customs officers had previously detained the man who killed nine people in San Jose, Calif., on Wednesday and found that he professed a hatred of his workplace where the shooting occurred, according to a Department of Homeland Security memo. The shooter, Samuel James Cassidy, possessed “books about terrorism and […]