Justices seem to split with senators, DOJ on interpretation of drug sentencing law

Bizar Male

The justices are expected to issue a ruling by the end of the term at the end of June. Tuesday marked the last day of arguments for this term.

In 2010, a law known as the Fair Sentencing Act changed the threshold for how much crack cocaine defendants had to have possessed before they qualified for a higher level and stiffer sentences. But that law applied only to new defendants, not for Terry and others who had been sentenced already.

Then, Congress passed the 2018 law known as the First Step Act, which sought to make the 2010 law retroactive. That would mean those sentenced for crack cocaine possession under the 1986 law now could ask a judge to reduce their sentences.

Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh said the questions from other justices Tuesday highlighted how the text of the law “doesn’t, at least at first glance, seem exactly in line with that goal.”

“Why didn’t Congress just say, ‘Everyone who’s been sentenced for crack offenses, under 841 is eligible for resentencing,’ something simple like that,” Kavanaugh said. “And I realize you can ask that kind of question in almost every statutory case, but here it seems like that would have been the easy way to do what you’ve described as Congress’ goal.”

Next Post

Linda Kerns: Judges should be faithful to Constitution

Pennsylvanians elect judges in odd years. More accurately, a small percentage of Pennsylvanians participate in these “off year” elections so that even though we have over 8 million registered voters, only about a million voters (12% ) weigh in on who should take the bench. That should worry those who […]